HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE
بِسم الله الرحمنِ الرحيم
الحمد لله رب العالمين ، والصلاة والسلام على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين
During the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) (632-634) and Umer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) (634-644) people trusted and acted upon the guidance of their Caliphs without any doubts. The atmosphere was contained and trust worthy. When Hazrat Abu Bakr (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) insisted upon collecting Zakat while Muslims were still mourning the death of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم), nobody revolted against him. Rather they trusted him and agreed to abide by this important Islamic obligation.
When Hazrat Umer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) asked Hazrat Khaled Ibn Al-Walid (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) (who won many battles against the then super powers - Sassanid Empire of Iran and Byzantine Empire of Rome) to step down from the position of Commander-in-Chief of the Muslim Army and appointed Hazrat Abu Obaida (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) in his place, not a single voice of dissent came out in open as people trusted Hazrat Omer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) in all the decisions he made.
Similarly, when during the reign of Hazrat Umer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ), the ruling for divorce was made as per the requirement and understanding of the people at that time, people trusted the senior Sahabah at that time who were consulted in this context. The divorce rulings established during Hadhrat Umar's (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) time is still followed through out the Muslim world. In the same way, when Hazrat Umer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) started Taraweeh prayer in congregation in mosques, everyone appreciated. As a matter of fact, Hazrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ), the greatest Jurist of Muslim Ummah, is reported to have praised Hazrat Umer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) publicly.
Why it was so? Because people knew that their religious guides will never do anything which is contrary to the teachings of Quran and Sunnah. Their trust in them was valid, which is testified by the recorded events of Islamic history.
It is a consensus opinion among Muslims that Hazrat Abu Bakr, Hazrat Umer, Hazrat Uthman and Hazrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہم ) were rightly guided Caliphs. Then why the last two Caliphs were treated badly by some Muslims? It is because, during their times, some Muslims thought it was their right to suspect the actions of the Caliph. They started judging Caliph’s decisions as per their limited knowledge.
What was the reasons for suspecting Caliph’s actions?
By the time Hazrat Uthman’s (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) became Caliph, many new territories were conquered by Muslims. New converts joined the Islamic nation. As the super powers were subdued, lot of wealth started pouring into Islamic nation. When the atmosphere changes, the look of the nation also changes. The new converts did not have the opportunity of training as the old Sahabah had during testing times. The new converts carried with them their old conventions and ways of thinking. When these two groups mixed, the atmosphere was sure to change. In this changed scenario, even the old good Muslims got carried away by the propaganda campaigns of the new converts.
It is a known fact that Sahabah are the best people among the entire Muslim Ummah. Among Sahabah the people who are associated with Badr are the best. Among them, the 10 companions (Ashra-e-Mubasshirah) are the best and among them, the 4 rightful Caliphs are the best in Muslim Ummah. This shows that the goodness and understanding of people differs from one another.
The goodness and understanding abilities of rightly guided Caliphs is greater than the rest of the companions of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم). Then, why the earlier two caliphs (Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Omer – رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہما) did not have the kind of trouble and challenges to their rule as faced by Hazrat Uthman and Hazrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہما)? It is because the earlier Caliphs had to deal with Muslims who had the opportunity to have the company of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم). In addition, they ruled with iron hand as they knew the mindset and background of tribal Arabs. The last two Caliphs were moderate in their dealings. They gave time to trouble makers to correct themselves rather than taking decisive actions.
After the death (in plague) of Yazid Ibn Abi Sufyan (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ), who was Governor of Syria, Hazrat Umer (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) appointed his brother, Mawiya Ibn Abi Sufyan (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) as Governor of Syria in 640 AD. Mawiya’s (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) rule and appointment of his son as heir apparent show the changing scenario of the Muslim nation. We have written many books about Muawiya bin Abi Sufyan (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ). All these books are available online.
As has been described earlier, when new territories were conquered by Muslims, people in these territories accepted Islam, wealth started pouring in and the worldly defects started to show up in Islamic state. These things came out in open during Hazrat Uthman’s (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) Caliphate (644 – 656). People started doubting the Caliph. Many new conspiracies were hatched against Hazrat Uthman (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) and finally he was martyred in his own house on July 17, 656 AD.
After the death of Hazrat Uthman (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) a huge confusion was created among Muslims by vested interests headed by Muawiya (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ). They divided the Muslim community vertically and convinced Ummul Momineen Aisha (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہا) that the Caliph, Hazrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) was not cooperating in arresting the assassins. When she was taken into confidence, they formed an army in her name, without any consultation with her and attempted to overthrow the Caliphate and made it look like She was fighting against the Caliph. Soon Ummul Momineen Aisha (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہا) realized the plots of these vested interest and kept herself away from them for the rest of her life. When they did not succeed in their attempt, they declared open mutiny against the Central Authority of the Caliph and fought wars with him.
The vested interest headed by Muawiya (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) never allowed the central authority to take control of Islamic territory. Hazrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) spent his six years of Caliphate (656-661 AD) in internal strife created by vested interests. Finally he was martyred in 661 AD.
After the collapse of the Central Authority a dynastic rule was established which was known as Umayyed dynasty. This dynasty eliminated all possible threats to their rule by eliminating everyone who opposed them.In their eagerness for power, they did not spare even the grandsons of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم). Hazrat Imam Hassan (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) (624-668) was poisoned and martyred and later the entire family of Hazrat Imam Hussain (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) (626 - 680) was martyred in Karbala, Iraq in October 680 AD.
The turmoil in Islamic Governance also had its effects on the cultural and spiritual atmosphere of the nation. The respect of the members of the Prophet’s (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) house hold and important Islamic icons was fast fading. Public curse and insult of Hadhrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) was officially sponsored by Muawiya (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) which continued for several decades after his death. For over 65 years, between 657 and 720 the curse was an official Government policy of the Umayyed dynasty. During this period, Hadhrat Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) and his sons were cursed and insulted at public platforms and Juma sermons in Government-controlled mosques all over the Islamic State.They mention the following authentic references. Luckily we had some good towering personalities during this tumultuous time who collected and preserved Prophet’s (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) traditions in book forms for the following generations.
The first biggest blow came from traditionists (Ahle Hadith). In their inability to understand the wisdom of earlier Imams of Fiqh (Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik, they alleged that these Imams depended more on their ‘own opinions, and analogical reasoning’ rather than Sunnah. The Traditionists failed to understand that these Imams were actually implementing Sunnah in all their actions. The traditionists debated with the adherents of the earlier Imams till Imam Shafi’i came on scene. Imam Shafi’i was the student of Imam Malik for several years but as per the requirements of the new times, he thought it necessary to write down the principles of ‘Islamic Jurisprudence’ in a booklet which satisfied both the traditionists and the adherents of old Imams.
Imam Abu Hanifah was born 19 years after the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ). This was the time of the first generation followers (ta’abaeen) of the companions of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم). The people in power were members of Umayyed dynastic rule. But Imam Abu Hanifah was lucky. He was close to the descendants of the Prophet’s (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) household. His teachers, among others, included Imam Mohammad Al-Baqir (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) (the second son of Hazrat Imam Hussain رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) who survived the Karbla episode), Imam Ja'far Al-Sadiq (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ), the grandson of Hazrat Hussain (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ), Imam Zayd Ibn 'Ali (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) and Hammad Ibn Sulayman (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ).
Imam Abu Hanifa is the first Scholar, Scientist and Jurist of Islamic Jurisprudence who had been trained under the guidance of the members of Prophet’s (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) household. Therefore, many Muslims refer him as Supreme Imam (Imam-e-Azam). He also had the opportunity to take guidance from first generation followers of the companions of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) who were settled in Kufa, Iraq.
During Imam Abu Hanifa’s time, Muslims had not started documenting things in a written format. As a matter of fact, the most authentic Hadith collector, Imam Bukhari was the student of the students of Imam Abu Hanifa. Imams Malik and Abu Hanifa both did not document in a written format the ‘Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence’ (Usul-e-Fiqh) they were practicing because it was not felt necessary during their time.
Some historians say that Imam Shafi’i was born on the day when Imam Abu Hanifa died. Imam Shafi’i was the first scholar and Islamic Jurist who wrote the principles of Islamic Jurisprudence in a booklet and made it public.
When we look at the life history of Imam Abu Hanifa , we come to the conclusion that the objections of the Traditionists (Ahle Hadith) at that time were out of context. In addition, it is not possible for a Muslim to suspect that an Islamic scholar of Imam of Abu Hanifa’s caliber, who was trained directly under the guidance and education of Ahle Bait-e-Rasulullah (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) and other Sahabah would use his personal opinions that do not match with Prophet's (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) commandments.
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal was the student of Imam Shafi’i, but he was more inclined towards the traditionists' point of view in certain respects. Therefore, he gave more emphasis on Ahadith of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) than on ‘opinion and analogical reasoning’. However, he did no yield one hundred per cent towards the traditionists point of view.
Later on, a consensus opinion was gradually evolved in Islamic nation that all the above Imams of Islamic Jurisprudence's points of views reflect the 4 corner borderline of Sharia. One end is held by Imam Abu Hanifa , the second one is held by Imam Malik, the third end is held by Imam Shafi’i, and the fourth end is held by Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Thus, it was considered that a Muslim should adhere to any of the above Imams in his following.
Imam Ahmad's observations on Quranic verses that depict Allah's (سبحانه و تعالى) attributes are misrepresented by Salafis. They quote Imam Ahmad to draw literal/textual meanings of these verses, to mean that Allah (سبحانه و تعالى) has hands, face, eyes and other limitations.
What Imam Ahmad said was 'not to ponder much on these verses and related Ahadith and let them be as they are and let us belief in the purport of Allah (سبحانه و تعالى) and His Apostle (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم)'. His statements did not mean that people take the literal/ textual meanings of these verses and claim hands, eyes and face and limitations for Allah (سبحانه و تعالى).
Some people claim that Imam Ahmad was textualist. This is misrepresentation of facts and false allegation on the Imam. If Imam Ahmad statements really meant, what Salafis claim, then he would have easily accepted Quran as the creation of Allah (سبحانه و تعالى) and saved himself from the physical torture of the then ruler who wanted him to declare Quran as a creation of Allah (سبحانه و تعالى).
This is a consensus opinion of the Muslim nation that after Imam Hanbal , the nation did not produce Muslim Jurists of the caliber of the 4 accepted Imams. Therefore, whatever research is done in the area of Islamic Jurisprudence, it is done within the borderlines of the 4 Imams’ points of view.
However, this consensus opinion was challenged by Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328) who described that the following of 4 Imams of Fiqh was their personal emulation (taqleed). He rejected all the 4 Imams of Fiqh en masse. He propagated his new Khariji thinking which was as per his limited understanding. Ibn Taymiyyah did not study Islamic subjects under Shuyookh during his time. The studied books on his own and misled people from his oratory skills. He became the inventor of a Khariji sect known as Salafism.
The followers of Salafism were very few for almost 5 centuries until the birth of Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi (1703-1792) who, on the back of military conquests of Sauds, the tribal lords of Najd, spread salafism in the whole of Arabian Peninsula.
Sauds took control of the Arabian peninsula in early 20th Century and made Salafism as their official religion. Salafis and their like minded groups have spread far and wide in the world these days.